The plural markers in the Guanzhong dialect primarily fall into four categories: the de type, the xie type, the men type, and the huo type. These plural markers exhibit certain differences in terms of geographical distribution, scope of application, and semantic expression. Among them, the plural marker men has the widest geographical distribution, while the plural marker xie has the narrowest. The plural markers men, de, huo, huoli, and xiege can only be attached to human-referring nominal elements to denote plurality, whereas the plural marker xie is not subject to this restriction and can also be attached to non-human-referring nominal elements to indicate plurality. The plural markers huo, huoli, and xiege can only express ordinary plural, while the plural markers men and de can express both ordinary plural and associative plural. The plural marker xie, on the other hand, can express ordinary plural, associative plural, and similative plural. The divergent origins of these plural markers are the primary reason for these observed differences.
Key words
plural /
markers /
Guanzhong dialect
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
戴昭銘。2000。歷史音變和吳方言人稱代詞複數形式的來歷。中國語文3。247–256, 287。Zhaoming Dai. 2000. Lishi yinbian he Wufangyan rencheng daici fushu xingshi de laili. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 247–256, 287.
丁加勇、沈禕。2014。湖南鳳凰話後置複數指示詞：兼論方言中複數標記“些”的來源。中國語文5。418–423, 480。Jiayong Ding & Yi Shen. 2014. Hunan Fenghuanghua houzhi fushu zhishici: Jianlun fangyan zhong fushu biaoji “xie” de laiyuan. Zhongguo Yuwen 5. 418–423, 480.
傅定淼。1986。貴州方言形態二例。貴州大學學報（社會科學版）4。78–82。Dingmiao Fu. 1986. Guizhou fangyan xingtai erli. Guizhou Daxue Xuebao, shehui kexue ban 4. 78–82.
江藍生。1995。說“麽”與“們”同源。中國語文3。180–190。Lansheng Jiang. 1995. Shuo “me” yu “men” tongyuan. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 180–190.
江藍生。2018。再論“們”的語源是“物”。中國語文3。259–273, 382。Lansheng Jiang. 2018. Zailun “men” de yuyuan shi “wu”. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 259–273, 382.
蘭賓漢。2011。西安方言語法調查研究。北京：中華書局。Binhan Lan. 2011. Xi’an Fangyan Yufa Diaocha Yanjiu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
蘭大中文系語言研究小組。1963。蘭州方言。蘭州大學學報2。81–141。Landa Zhongwenxi Yuyan Yanjiu Xiaozu. 1963. Lanzhou fangyan. Lanzhou Daxue Xuebao 2. 81–141.
李斐。2003。陝西潼關方言研究。西安：陝西師範大學碩士學位論文。Fei Li. 2003. Shaanxi Tongguan fangyan yanjiu. Xi’an: Shaanxi Shifan Daxue shuoshi xuewei lunwen.
李榮。1965。語音演變規律的例外。中國語文2。116–126。Rong Li. 1965. Yuyin yanbian guilü de liwai. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 116–126.
李豔惠、石毓智。2000。漢語量詞系統的建立與複數標記“們”的發展。當代語言學1。27–36, 61–62。Yen-hui Li & Yuzhi Shi. 2000. Hanyu liangci xitong de jianli yu fushu biaoji “men” de fazhan. Dangdai Yuyanxue 1. 27–36, 61–62.
雒鵬。2016。甘肅漢語方言人稱代詞。見全國漢語方言學會《中國方言學報》編委會（編），中國方言學報（第六期），83–91。北京：商務印書館。Peng Luo. 2016. Gansu Hanyu fangyan rencheng daici. In Quanguo Hanyu Fangyan Xuehui Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao Bianweihui (ed.), Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao, diliu qi, 83–91. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
呂叔湘。1985。近代漢語指代詞。上海：學林出版社。Shuxiang Lü. 1985. Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici. Shanghai: Xuelin Chubanshe.
呂枕甲。1991。運城方言志。太原：山西高校聯合出版社。Zhenjia Lü. 1991. Yuncheng Fangyanzhi. Taiyuan: Shanxi Gaoxiao Lianhe Chubanshe.
彭曉輝。2008。漢語方言複數標記系統研究。長沙：湖南師範大學博士學位論文。Xiaohui Peng. 2008. Hanyu fangyan fushu biaoji xitong yanjiu. Changsha: Hunan Shifan Daxue boshi xuewei lunwen.
覃洲。2018。成都方言常用名詞性後綴研究。上海：上海外國語大學碩士學位論文。Zhou Qin. 2018. Chengdu fangyan changyong mingcixing houzhui yanjiu. Shanghai: Shanghai Waiguoyu Daxue shuoshi xuewei lunwen.
秋谷裕幸、徐朋彪。2016。韓城方言調查研究。北京：中華書局。Hiroyuki Akitani & Pengbiao Xu. 2016. Hancheng Fangyan Diaocha Yanjiu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
孫立新。2002。關中方言代詞概要。方言3。246–259。Lixin Sun. 2002. Guanzhong fangyan daici gaiyao. Fangyan 3. 246–259.
孫立新。2010。關中方言代詞研究。西安：三秦出版社。Lixin Sun. 2010. Guanzhong Fangyan Daici Yanjiu. Xi’an: Sanqin Chubanshe.
銅川市印臺區地方志編纂委員會（編）。2020。銅川市印臺區志。西安：三秦出版社。Tongchuanshi Yintaiqu Difangzhi Bianzuan Weiyuanhui. 2020. Tongchuanshi Yintaiquzhi. Xi’an: Sanqin Chubanshe.
塗光祿。1990。貴陽方言中表示複數的“些”。中國語文6。438。Guanglu Tu. 1990. Guiyang fangyan zhong biaoshi fushu de “xie”. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 438.
王寶紅。1999。寶雞方言裡“的”字的用法。寶雞文理學院學報（社會科學版）19(1)。43–45。Baohong Wang. 1999. Baoji fangyan li “de”zi de yongfa. Baoji Wenli Xueyuan Xuebao, shehui kexue ban 19(1). 43–45.
王春玲。2020。漢語人稱代詞複數標記的類型學考察。西南大學學報（社會科學版）46(5)。153–163。Chunling Wang. 2020. Hanyu rencheng daici fushu biaoji de leixingxue kaocha. Xinan Daxue Xuebao, shehui kexue ban 46(5). 153–163.
王軍虎。1996。西安方言詞典。南京：江蘇教育出版社。Junhu Wang. 1996. Xi’an Fangyan Cidian. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
王臨惠。2025。歷史文獻與西北方言研究。語言與文化論叢1。21–33, 315–316。Linhui Wang. 2025. Lishi wenxian yu xibei fangyan yanjiu. Yuyan yu Wenhua Luncong 1. 21–33, 315–316.
王統尚、石毓智。2025。漢語方言兩類複數標記的類型規律。長江學術2。114–128。Tongshang Wang & Yuzhi Shi. 2025. Hanyu fangyan lianglei fushu biaoji de leixing guilü. Changjiang Xueshu 2. 114–128.
毋效智。2005。扶風方言。烏魯木齊：新疆大學出版社。Xiaozhi Wu. 2005. Fufeng Fangyan. Wulumuqi: Xinjiang Daxue Chubanshe.
吳偉軍。2023。貴州安順方言複數標記“些”及“的些”的詞彙化。見全國漢語方言學會《中國方言學報》編委會（編），中國方言學報（第十期），207–217。北京：商務印書館。Weijun Wu. 2023. Guizhou Anshun fangyan fushu biaoji “xie” ji “de xie” de cihuihua. In Quanguo Hanyu Fangyan Xuehui Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao Bianweihui (ed.), Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao, dishi qi, 207–217. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
邢福義。1965。再談“們”和表數詞語並用的現象。中國語文5。365–366。Fuyi Xing. 1965. Zaitan “men” he biaoshu ciyu bingyong de xianxiang. Zhongguo Yuwen 5. 365–366.
邢向東、蔡文婷。2010。合陽方言調查研究。北京：中華書局。Xiangdong Xing & Wenting Cai. 2010. Heyang Fangyan Diaocha Yanjiu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
楊炎華。2015。複數標記“們”和集合標記“們”。語言教學與研究6。78–88。Yanhua Yang. 2015. Fushu biaoji “men” he jihe biaoji “men”. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 6. 78–88.
楊炎華、李彥霞。2021。山西晉語離石方言的“弭”。澳門語言學刊1。33–41。Yanhua Yang & Yanxia Li. 2021. Shanxi Jinyu Lishi fangyan de “mi”. Aomen Yuyan Xuekan 1. 33–41.
楊炎華、劉道海。2023。耀州方言複數表達形式。語言研究43(1)。84–90。Yanhua Yang & Daohai Liu. 2023. Yaozhou fangyan fushu biaoda xingshi. Yuyan Yanjiu 43(1). 84–90.
楊炎華、桑紫宏。2023。再從“們”字談漢語語法的特點。當代語言學25(3)。342–361。Yanhua Yang & Zihong Sang. 2023. Zaicong “men”zi tan Hanyu yufa de tedian. Dangdai Yuayanxue 25(3). 342–361.
葉豔麗。2016。陝西大荔方言詞彙研究。湘潭：湖南科技大學碩士學位論文。Yanli Ye. 2016. Shaanxi Dali fangyan cihui yanjiu. Xiangtan: Hunan Keji Daxue shuoshi xuewei lunwen.
張成材。2009。商州方言詞彙研究。西寧：青海人民出版社。Chengcai Zhang. 2009. Shangzhou Fangyan Cihui Yanjiu. Xining: Qinghai Renmin Chubanshe.
張崇。2000。西安、吳堡等地的單音複數人稱代詞及其成因。西安外國語學院學報8(2)。41–42。Chong Zhang. 2000. Xi’an, Wubu dengdi de danyin fushu rencheng daici ji qi chengyin. Xi’an Waiguoyu Xueyuan Xuebao 8(2). 41–42.
張家合。2016。“些類詞”的歷史流變及相關問題。唐山師範學院學報38(1)。26–30。Jiahe Zhang. 2016. “Xie lei ci” de lishi liubian ji xiangguan wenti. Tangshan Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao 38(1). 26–30.
張曉靜、陳澤平。2015。河北武邑方言複數標記“們”。中國語文2。153–157。Xiaojing Zhang & Zeping Chen. 2015. Hebei Wuyi fangyan fushu biaoji “men”. Zhongguo Yuwen 2. 153–157.
張一舟、張清源、鄧英樹。2001。成都方言語法研究。成都：巴蜀書社。Yizhou Zhang, Qingyuan Zhang & Yingshu Deng. 2001. Chengdu Fangyan Yufa Yanjiu. Chengdu: Bashu Shushe.
張誼生。2001。“N”+“們”的選擇限制與“N們”的表義功用。中國語文3。201–211, 287。Yisheng Zhang. 2001. “N” + “men” de xuanze xianzhi yu “N men” de biaoyi gongyong. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 201–211, 287.
張永哲。2011。鳳翔方言代詞研究。西安：陝西師範大學碩士學位論文。Yongzhe Zhang. 2011. Fengxiang fangyan daici yanjiu. Xi’an: Shaanxi Shifan Daxue shuoshi xuewei lunwen.
張永哲。2016。關中方言詞彙研究。西安：陝西師範大學博士學位論文。Yongzhe Zhang. 2016. Guanzhong fangyan cihui yanjiu. Xi’an: Shaanxi Shifan Daxue boshi xuewei lunwen.
趙變親。2012。晉南中原官話的人稱代詞。方言2。162–167。Bianqin Zhao. 2012. Jinnan Zhongyuan Guanhua de renchengdaici. Fangyan 2. 162–167.
趙世舉。2004。“和你”即“夥裡/夥的”。中國語文1。58–60。Shiju Zhao. 2004. “He ni” ji “huo li/huo di”. Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 58–60.
Corbett, Greville G. 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Daniel, Michael. 2020. Associative plural as indexical category. Language Sciences 81. 101256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2019.101256 (accessed 3 May 2025).
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Coding of nominal plurality. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/33 (accessed 17 June 2025).
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2023. Heterogeneous sets: A diachronic typology of associative and similative plurals. Linguistic Typology 27(1). 1–40.
Moravcsik, Edith A. 2003. A semantic analysis of associative plurals. Studies in Language 27(3). 469–503.
PDF(835 KB)
