山西文水縣(胡蘭)方言的“還”與“麼”——基於主觀評價性形態的視角

呂佩

中國語文通訊 ›› 2026, Vol. 105 ›› Issue (1) : 197-216.

PDF(846 KB)
PDF(846 KB)
中國語文通訊 ›› 2026, Vol. 105 ›› Issue (1) : 197-216. DOI: 10.65961/crcl-2026-0011

山西文水縣(胡蘭)方言的“還”與“麼”——基於主觀評價性形態的視角

  • 呂佩
作者信息 +

Hang and me in the Wenshui (Hulan) Dialect in Shanxi Province: Based on the Perspective of Subjective Evaluative Morphology

  • Pei Lü
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

山西文水縣(胡蘭)方言中的“還”“麼”,在句法、語義和語用等方面存在諸多的共性,但在表達功用方面也存在明顯的差異。“還”“麼”屬於典型的主觀性評價形態,都與主觀量有關,這是二者共性背後的相關動因。“還”屬於主觀減量,“麼”屬於主觀適量,這導致二者存在用法上的差異。

Abstract

Hang and me in the Wenshui (Hulan) dialect in Shanxi Province have many commonalities in syntax, semantics, and pragmatics. However, there are also obvious differences in expression function. Hang and me belong to the typical subjective evaluative morphology and are related to the subjective quantity, which is the relevant motivation behind the commonality of the two. Hang belongs to the subjective decrement and me belongs to the subjective increment, which lead to the difference in usage between the two.

关键词

山西文水方言 / “還” / “麼” / 主觀性評價形態 / 主觀量

Key words

Shanxi Wenshui dialect / hang / me / subjective evaluative morphology / subjective quantity

引用本文

导出引用
呂佩. 山西文水縣(胡蘭)方言的“還”與“麼”——基於主觀評價性形態的視角[J]. 中国语文通讯. 2026, 105(1): 197-216 https://doi.org/10.65961/crcl-2026-0011
Pei Lü. Hang and me in the Wenshui (Hulan) Dialect in Shanxi Province: Based on the Perspective of Subjective Evaluative Morphology[J]. Current Research in Chinese Linguistics. 2026, 105(1): 197-216 https://doi.org/10.65961/crcl-2026-0011

参考文献

北京大學中文系1955、1957級語言班。1982。現代漢語虛詞例釋。北京:商務印書館。Beijing Daxue Zhongwenxi 1955, 1957 Ji Yuyanban. 1982. Xiandai Hanyu Xuci Lishi. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
陳小荷。1994。主觀量問題初探——兼談副詞“就”“才”“都”。世界漢語教學4。18–24。Xiaohe Chen. 1994. Zhuguanliang wenti chutan: Jiantan fuci “jiu”, “cai”, “dou”. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 4. 18–24.
崔希亮。2019。漢語語氣詞“~嘛”的情態意義。語言教學與研究4。60–68。Xiliang Cui. 2019. Hanyu yuqici “~ ma” de qingtai yiyi. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 4. 60–68.
崔永華。1984。“連……也/都……”句式試析。語言教學與研究4。30–44。Yonghua Cui. 1984. “Lian…ye/dou…” jushi shixi. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 4. 30–44.
丁健。2019。語言的“交互主觀性”——內涵、類型與假說。當代語言學3。333–349。Jian Ding. 2019. Yuyan de “jiaohu zhuguanxing”: Neihan, leixing yu jiashuo. Dangdai Yuyanxue 3. 333–349.
董秀芳。2016。主觀性表達在漢語中的凸顯性及其表現特徵。語言科學6。561–570。Xiufang Dong. 2016. Zhuguanxing biaoda zai Hanyu zhong de tuxianxing ji qi biaoxian tezheng. Yuyan Kexue 6. 561–570.
董秀芳。2021。漢藏語系語言的評價性形態。民族語文2。3–14。Xiufang Dong. 2021. Hanzang yuxi yuyan de pingjiaxing xingtai. Minzu Yuwen 2. 3–14.
范慧琴。2007。定襄方言語法研究。北京:語文出版社。Huiqin Fan. 2007. Dingxiang Fangyan Yufa Yanjiu. Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.
郭利霞。2011。山西山陰方言的拷貝式話題句。中國語文3。253–259, 288。Lixia Guo. 2011. Shanxi Shanyin fangyan de kaobei shi huati ju. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 253–259, 288.
郭利霞。2015。山西山陰方言的主觀棄擇句“X麼(Y)”。中國語文1。67–72。Lixia Guo. 2015. Shanxi Shanyin fangyan de zhuguan qize ju “X(me)Y”. Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 67–72.
郭利霞。2018。山西山陰方言的多功能虛詞“還”。方言1。28–35。Lixia Guo. 2018. Shanxi Shanyin fangyan de duogongneng xuci “[xεe]/[xəʔ]”. Fangyan 1. 28–35.
黑維強、高怡喆。2017。陝西綏德方言“還”的兩種用法及其語法化。方言3。368–375。Weiqiang Hei & Yizhe Gao. 2017. Shaanxi Suide fangyan “[xæ]” de liangzhong yongfa ji qi yufahua. Fangyan 3. 368–375.
金立鑫、楊炎華。2024。論morphology與漢語語言學中的“形態”。見復旦大學漢語言文字學科《語言研究集刊》編委會(編),語言研究集刊(第三十三輯),1–20。上海:上海辭書出版社。Lixin Jin & Yanhua Yang. 2024. Lun morphology yu Hanyu yuyanxue zhong de “xingtai”. In Fudan Daxue Hanyuyan Wenzi Xueke Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan Bianweihui (ed.), Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan, disanshisan ji, 1–20. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.
李善熙。2003。漢語“主觀量”的表達研究。北京:中國社會科學院研究生院博士學位論文。Shanxi Li. 2003. Hanyu “zhuguanliang” de biaoda yanjiu. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Yanjiushengyuan boshi xuewei lunwen.
李宇明。2000。漢語量範疇研究。武漢:華中師範大學出版社。Yuming Li. 2000. Hanyu Liang Fanchou Yanjiu. Wuhan: Huazhong Shifan Daxue Chubanshe.
劉丹青。2005。作為典型構式句的非典型“連”字句。語言教學與研究4。1–12。Danqing Liu. 2005. Zuowei dianxing goushi ju de feidianxing “lian”zi ju. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 4. 1–12.
呂叔湘(主編)。1999。現代漢語八百詞(增訂本)。北京:商務印書館。Shuxiang Lü et al. (eds.). 1999. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci, zengding ben. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
佩恩。2021。描寫形態句法——田野語言學指南,吳福祥、張定等(譯)。北京:商務印書館。Thomas E. Payne. 2021. Miaoxie Xingtai Jufa: Tianye Yuyanxue Zhinan [Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists], trans. by Fuxiang Wu, Ding Zhang et al. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
任鷹。2013。“個”的主觀賦量功能及其語義基礎。世界漢語教學3。362–375。Ying Ren. 2013. “Ge” de zhuguan fuliang gongneng ji qi yuyi jichu. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 3. 362–375.
沈家煊。2001。跟副詞“還”有關的兩個句式。中國語文6。483–493, 575。Jiaxuan Shen. 2001. Gen fuci “hai” youguan de liangge jushi. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 483–493, 575.
史秀菊、郝晶晶。2018。山西平遙方言複句關聯標記“門”的演變——從後置到前置。中國語文6。672–680, 766–767。Xiuju Shi & Jingjing Hao. 2018. Shanxi Pingyao fangyan fuju guanlian biaoji “[məŋ213]” de yanbian: Cong houzhi dao qianzhi. Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 672–680, 766–767.
完權。2017。漢語(交互)主觀性表達的句法位置。漢語學習3。3–12。Quan Wan. 2017. Hanyu (jiaohu) zhuguanxing biaoda de jufa weizhi. Hanyu Xuexi 3. 3–12.
王倩。2012。現代漢語增量與減量構式研究。長春:吉林大學博士學位論文。Qian Wang. 2012. Xiandai Hanyu zengliang yu jianliang goushi yanjiu. Changchun: Jilin Daxue boshi xuewei lunwen.
溫鎖林。2020。山西壽陽方言幾種值得關注的狀語後置現象。見全國漢語方言學會《中國方言學報》編委會(編),中國方言學報(第八期),139–151。北京:商務印書館。Suolin Wen. 2020. Shanxi Shouyang fangyan jizhong zhide guanzhu de zhuangyu houzhi xianxiang. In Quanguo Hanyu Fangyan Xuehui Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao Bianweihui (ed.), Zhongguo Fangyan Xuebao, diba qi, 139–151. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
邢向東。1995。內蒙古晉語的語氣詞“的”、“呀”、“麼”。文科教學2。41–45。Xiangdong Xing. 1995. Neimenggu Jinyu de yuqici “de”, “ya”, “me”. Wenke Jiaoxue 2. 41–45.
邢向東。2002。神木方言研究。北京:中華書局。Xiangdong Xing. 2002. Shenmu Fangyan Yanjiu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
邢向東。2007。移位和隱含:論晉語句中虛詞的語氣詞化。語言暨語言學8(4)。1025–1041。Xiangdong Xing. 2007. Yiwei he yinhan: Lun Jinyu ju zhong xuci de yuqicihua. Yuyan ji Yuyanxue 8(4). 1025–1041.
張耕。2022。現代漢語主觀量的表達機制及其實現條件。世界漢語教學2。211–224。Geng Zhang. 2022. Xiandai Hanyu zhuguanliang de biaoda jizhi ji qi shixian tiaojian. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 2. 211–224.
張敏。1998。認知語言學與漢語名詞短語。北京:中國社會科學出版社。Min Zhang. 1998. Renzhi Yuyanxue yu Hanyu Mingci Duanyu. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.
張誼生。1997。副詞的重疊形式與基礎形式。世界漢語教學4。42–54。Yisheng Zhang. 1997. Fuci de chongdie xingshi yu jichu xingshi. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue 4. 42–54.
宗守雲。2015。晉語表輕貶意義的句末語氣詞“還”。見北京師範大學文學院(編),勵耘語言學刊(第二十一輯)。138–147。北京:學苑出版社。Shouyun Zong. 2015. Jinyu biao qingbian yiyi de jumo yuqici “hai”. In Beijing Shifan Daxue Wenxueyuan (ed.), Liyun Yuyan Xuekan, di’ershiyi ji, 138–147. Beijing: Xueyuan Chubanshe.
宗守雲。2016。“還X呢”構式:行域貶抑、知域否定、言域嗔怪。語言教學與研究4。94–103。Shouyun Zong. 2016. “Hai X ne” goushi: Xingyu bianyi, zhiyu fouding, yanyu chenguai. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 4. 94–103.
宗守雲。2021a。社會固有模式的研究動態、概念描述和性質特徵。見上海師範大學語言研究所《東方語言學》編委會(編),東方語言學(第二十一輯)。55–76。上海:上海教育出版社。Shouyun Zong. 2021a. Shehui guyou moshi de yanjiu dongtai, gainian miaoshu he xingzhi tezheng. In Shanghai Shifan Daxue Yuyan Yanjiusuo Dongfang Yuyanxue Bianweihui (ed.), Dongfang Yuyanxue, di’ershiyi ji, 55–76. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
宗守雲。2021b。張家口方言涉預期句式“S,是正V麼”試析。河北師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)5。118–125。Shouyun Zong. 2021b. Zhangjiakou fangyan she yuqi jushi “S, shi zheng V me” shixi. Hebei Shifan Daxue Xuebao, zhexue shehui kexue ban 5. 118–125.
宗守雲。2025。論社會固有模式對漢語語法的影響。上海師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)3。102–109。Shouyun Zong. 2025. Lun shehui guyou moshi dui Hanyu yufa de yingxiang. Shanghai Shifan Daxue Xuebao, zhexue shehui kexue ban 3. 102–109.
宗守雲、張素玲。2014。社會固有模式對構式的影響——以“放著NP不VP”為例。漢語學報3。22–30, 95。Shouyun Zong & Suling Zhang. 2014. Shehui guyou moshi dui goushi de yingxiang: Yi “fangzhe NP bu VP” weili. Hanyu Xuebao 3. 22–30, 95.
宗守雲、趙慧媛。2025。張家口方言確認語氣詞“麼”。見復旦大學漢語言文字學科《語言研究集刊》編委會(編),語言研究集刊(第三十五輯),189–200。上海:上海辭書出版社。Shouyun Zong & Huiyuan Zhao. 2025. Zhangjiakou fangyan queren yuqici “me”. In Fudan Daxue Hanyuyan Wenzi Xueke Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan Bianweihui (ed.), Yuyan Yanjiu Jikan, disanshiwu ji, 189–200. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe.
Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-morpheme base morphology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Chappell, Hilary. 1991. Strategies for the assertion of obviousness and disagreement in Mandarin: A semantic study of the modal particle me. Australian Journal of Linguistics 11(1). 39–65.
Lakoff, George. 1990. Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.

PDF(846 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/