吳語台州方言的確認義句末標記——以仙居和臨海方言為例

潘雪雨晴, 盧笑予

中国语文通讯 ›› 2025, Vol. 104 ›› Issue (2) : 311-332.

PDF(865 KB)
PDF(865 KB)
中国语文通讯 ›› 2025, Vol. 104 ›› Issue (2) : 311-332. DOI: 10.29499/CrCL.202507_104(2).0003
專題:第十屆方言語法博學論壇

吳語台州方言的確認義句末標記——以仙居和臨海方言為例

  • 潘雪雨晴, 盧笑予
作者信息 +

Sentence-final Markers of Affirmation in the Taizhou Wu Dialect: Take Xianju and Linhai Dialects for Example

  • Xueyuqing Pan, Xiaoyu Lu
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

吳語台州方言中有兩類與量詞“個”同源的確認義句末標記。其中,一般確認標記為“個”的弱化形式,用於表達肯定語氣;強化確認標記則與“個”同形,用於強調事件或狀態“本就如此”。一般確認標記和強化確認標記的產生分別源自“個”在有核和無核結構中的功能虛化,並反映出修飾和領屬兩類語義的分化。

Abstract

At the end of sentences, the Taizhou Wu dialect employs two affirmative markers that are both derived from the classifier ge. The general affirmative marker takes the weak form of ge and helps to express a sense of confirmation, while the emphatic affirmative marker is homophonous with ge and is used to assert that an event or state is inherently the case. The general affirmative marker and the emphatic affirmative marker evolved through the grammaticalization of ge in headed and headless structures, respectively, which also reflects a salient distinction between modification and possession.

关键词

台州方言 / 一般確認標記 / 強化確認標記 / 領屬 / 修飾

Key words

Taizhou dialect / general affirmative marker / emphatic affirmative marker / possession / modification

引用本文

导出引用
潘雪雨晴, 盧笑予. 吳語台州方言的確認義句末標記——以仙居和臨海方言為例[J]. 中国语文通讯. 2025, 104(2): 311-332 https://doi.org/10.29499/CrCL.202507_104(2).0003
Xueyuqing Pan, Xiaoyu Lu. Sentence-final Markers of Affirmation in the Taizhou Wu Dialect: Take Xianju and Linhai Dialects for Example[J]. Current Research in Chinese Linguistics. 2025, 104(2): 311-332 https://doi.org/10.29499/CrCL.202507_104(2).0003

参考文献

蔡國璐(編).1995.丹陽方言詞典.見李榮(編),現代漢語方言大詞典.南京:江蘇教育出版社.Guolu Cai (ed.). 1995. Danyang Fangyan Cidian. In Rong Li (ed.), Xiandai Hanyu Fangyan Dacidian. Nanjing: Jiangsu Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
曹廣順. 1994.說助詞“個”.古漢語研究 4.28-32.Guangshun Cao. 1994. Shuo zhuci “ge”.Guhanyu Yanjiu 4. 28-32.
戴慶廈、聞靜. 2011.漢藏語的“的”字結構.漢語學報 4.11-20.Qingxia Dai & Jing Wen. 2011. Hanzangyu de “de” zi jiegou.Hanyu Xuebao 4. 11-20.
戴昭銘. 2006.天台方言研究.北京:中華書局.Zhaoming Dai. 2006. Tiantai Fangyan Yanjiu. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
范曉蕾. 2020.漢語情態詞的語義地圖研究.北京:商務印書館.Xiaolei Fan. 2020. Hanyu Qingtaici de Yuyi Ditu Yanjiu. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
范曉蕾. 2024.句末助詞“的”的功能分類及語義演變.漢語學報 2.2-14.Xiaolei Fan. 2024. Jumozhuci “de” de gongneng fenlei ji yuyi yanbian.Hanyu Xuebao 2. 2-14.
郭銳、 李知恩. 2021. 量詞的功能擴張. 中國語文 6.691-712.Rui Guo & Zhi’en Li. 2021. Liangci de gongneng kuozhang.Zhongguo Yuwen 6. 691-712.
黃燕旋. 2020.潮州方言“指量名”結構的分化及演變.語言科學 19(5).542-560.Yanxuan Huang. 2020. Chaozhou fangyan “zhiliangming” jiegou de fenhua ji yanbian.Yuyan Kexue 19(5). 542-560.
李明. 2018.副詞“本”的演變.古漢語研究 3.2-15.Ming Li. 2018. Fuci “ben” de yanbian.Guhanyu Yanjiu 3. 2-15.
李榮. 1992.溫嶺方言的輕聲.方言 1.1-8.Rong Li. 1992. Wenling fangyan de qingsheng.Fangyan 1. 1-8.
李小軍. 2016a.漢語語法化演變中的音變及音義互動關係.北京:中國社會科學出版社.Xiaojun Li. 2016a. Hanyu Yufahua Yanbian zhong de Yinbian ji Yinyi Hudong Guanxi. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chubanshe.
李小軍. 2016b.漢語量詞“個”的語義演化模式.語言科學 15(2).150-164.Xiaojun Li. 2016b. Hanyu liangci “ge” de yuyi yanhua moshi.Yuyan Kexue 15(2). 150-164.
李豔惠. 2012.從臺灣閩南語 e 看漢語含“的”的名詞短語結構.東方語言學 11(1).82-92.Yen-Hui Audrey Li. 2012. Cong Taiwan Minnanyu e kan Hanyu han “de” de mingci duanyu jiegou.Dongfang Yuyanxue 11(1). 82-92.
劉丹青(編).2019.語法調查研究手冊(第 2 版).上海:上海教育出版社.Danqing Liu (ed.). 2019. Yufa Diaocha Yanjiu Shouce, di 2 ban. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe.
呂曉玲. 2012.福建南安方言結構助詞“其”的連用格式.中國語文 1.50-53.Xiaoling Lü. 2012. Fujian Nanan fangyan jiegou zhuci “qi” de lianyong geshi.Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 50-53.
潘雪雨晴. 2022.浙江仙居方言類“的”語法成分研究.上海外國語大學碩士學位論文.Xueyuqing Pan. 2022. Zhejiang Xianju fangyan lei “de” yufa chengfen yanjiu. Shanghai: Shanghai Waiguoyu Daxue shuoshi xuewei lunwen.
錢乃榮. 1998.吳語中的“個”和“介”.語言研究 2.78-89.Nairong Qian. 1998. Wuyu zhong de “ge” he “jie”.Yuyan Yanjiu 2. 78-89.
盛益民. 2017.漢語方言定指“量名”結構的類型差異與共性表現.當代語言學 19(2).181-206.Yiming Sheng. 2017. Hanyu fangyan dingzhi “liangming” jiegou de leixing chayi yu gongxing biaoxian.Dangdai Yuyanxue 19(2). 181-206.
唐為群. 2010.副詞“本來”和“本來”句.武漢大學學報(人文科學版)63(4).477-482. Weiqun Tang. 2010. Fuci “benlai” he “benlai” ju. Wuhan Daxue Xuebao, renwen kexue ban 63(4). 477-482.
完權. 2013.事態句中的“的”.中國語文 1.51-61.Quan Wan. 2013. Shitaiju zhong de “de”.Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 51-61.
項夢冰. 2001.關於東南方言結構助詞的比較研究.語言研究 2.1-6.Mengbing Xiang. 2001. Guanyu dongnan fangyan jiegou zhuci de bijiao yanjiu.Yuyan Yanjiu 2. 1-6.
袁毓林. 2003.從焦點理論看句尾“的”的句法語義功能.中國語文 1.3-16.Yulin Yuan. 2003. Cong jiaodian lilun kan juwei “de” de jufa yuyi gongneng.Zhongguo Yuwen 1. 3-16.
張磊. 2021.山東無棣方言的定語標記“那 [·nǝ]”.方言 1.73-81.Lei Zhang. 2021. Shandong Wudi fangyan de dingyu biaoji “na [·nǝ]”.Fangyan 1. 73-81.
趙日新. 1999. 說“個”.語言教學與研究 2.36-52.Rixin Zhao. 1999. Shuo “ge”.Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu 2. 36-52.
朱德熙. 1961.說“的”.中國語文 12.1-15.Dexi Zhu. 1961. Shuo “de”.Zhongguo Yuwen 12. 1-15.
朱德熙. 2020.“的”字的方言比較研究.見北京大學中國語言學研究中心《語言學論叢》編委會(編),語言學論叢 61,1-43.北京:北京大學出版社.Dexi Zhu. 2020. In Beijing Daxue Zhongguo Yuyanxue Yanjiu Zhongxin Yuyanxue Luncong Bianweihui (ed.), “De” zi de fangyan bijiao yanjiu. Yuyanxue Luncun 61, 1-43. Beijing: Beijing Daxue Chubanshe.
Nikolaeva, Irina & Andrew Spencer. 2013. Possession and modification - A perspective from Canonical Typology. In Dunstan Brown, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Canonical morphology and syntax, 207-238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

PDF(865 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/